Yet another proof of the Lyapunov convexity theorem
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Yet Another Proof of Cantor’s Theorem
We present various proofs of Cantor’s theorem in set theory: namely that the cardinality of the power set of a set X exceeds the cardinality of X, and in particular the continuum is uncountable. One of the proofs we present is inspired by Yablo’s non-self-referential Liar’s paradox, and it seems to bear a dual relationship to yet another proof.
متن کاملYet Another Proof of Marstrand’s Theorem
through the origin containing vθ and projθ : R 2 → Lθ the orthogonal projection. From now on, we’ll restrict θ to the interval [−π/2, π/2], because Lθ = Lθ+π. In 1954, J. M. Marstrand [10] proved the following result on the fractal dimension of plane sets. Theorem 1.1. If K ⊂ R is a Borel set such that HD(K) > 1, then m(projθ(K)) > 0 for m-almost every θ ∈ R. The proof is based on a qualitative...
متن کاملAnother proof of Banaschewski's surjection theorem
We present a new proof of Banaschewski's theorem stating that the completion lift of a uniform surjection is a surjection. The new procedure allows to extend the fact (and, similarly, the related theorem on closed uniform sublocales of complete uniform frames) to quasi-uniformities ("not necessarily symmetric uniformities"). Further, we show how a (regular) Cauchy point on a closed uniform subl...
متن کاملYet another proof of Gaboriau-Popa
This note recasts the proof of Gaboriau-Popa in a way which does not use property (T). 1 Preface and clarification In [1], after a number of partial results by various authors, Damien Gaboriau and Sorin Popa showed that non-abelian countable free groups have uncountably many measure preserving, ergodic, actions on standard Borel probability spaces up to orbit equivalence. The original proof use...
متن کاملAnother Proof of Clairaut's Theorem
This note gives an alternate proof of Clairaut’s theorem—that the partial derivatives of a smooth function commute—using the Stone–Weierstrass theorem. Most calculus students have probably encountered Clairaut’s theorem. Theorem. Suppose that f : [a, b] × [c, d] → R has continuous second-order partial derivatives. Then fxy = fyx on (a, b)× (c, d). The proof found in many calculus textbooks (e.g...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
سال: 1990
ISSN: 0002-9939
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-0993737-0